|
Disinfection workshop summary
Weighing the risks and benefits of wet-weather disinfection
Presented at The Rosamond Gifford Zoo, Syracuse, NY
October 15, 2002
Background
As municipalities across the nation enact programs to
control combined sewer overflows (CSOs) and storm
water runoff, disinfection of these wet-weather flows is
becoming more prevalent.
Disinfection of wet-weather flows is nothing new; the
USEPA has consistently demonstrated the benefits, in
terms of public health protection, for more than 30
years. USEPA research has also shown that disinfectants
can react with organic matter in wet-weather flows to
form substances known as disinfection by-products
(DBPs). Concerns about potential impacts on aquatic
organisms over the past decade have led to
requirements for dechlorination when chlorine
disinfectants are used to treat sewage and wet weather
flows to eliminate free chlorine and limit the
production of chlorine by-products.
USEPA and the Water Environment Research Foundation
(WERF) are sponsoring an evaluation of the benefits
and risks of disinfecting wet-weather flows.
Preliminary findings from the WERF project were
presented at this workshop. The results of the
evaluation will help guide municipal officials,
regulatory policy-makers, and wastewater professionals
who are developing CSO or storm water disinfection
policies and selecting disinfection technologies.
Excerpt from the workshop
The NYSDEC attempts to balance human health protection
with potential environmental impacts, but human health
protection is the priority. If bathing beaches, public
water supplies or potential for impacts to human
health are present, then disinfection is generally
required. NYSDEC's position on
chlorination-dechlorination is that it is a safe
practice for human contact recreation and sensitive
aquatic organisms.
|